Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Dead Kid Not A Huge Tragedy

 
Three days of extensive searches for missing eight-year-old Larry Golnik ended yesterday, as the boy’s decomposed body was discovered along the side of a creek near Henderson Pass Road, in Pragerville, Montana. Golnik's relatives never wailed or screamed once upon seeing little Larry's dead bloated body. Instead they simply shook their heads, shrugged their shoulders, and went and got back in their cars and left the scene. Saying they were "starving" and needed to "go get a bite". Police reports state the Humphries Elementary School student’s body was found in the vicinity of the large strip mine along Cougar Creek at around 3 pm. A passer-by contacted police after he spotted the boy’s grossly distended and decomposing remains there. Police spectulated that the kid's body washed up on the bank and might have been dumped a short distance from where it was discovered. The cause of the boy’s death is yet to be determined. Police, however, said it was too early to say if there were marks of violence. Police cordoned off the area, preventing vehicular traffic from entering and leaving the area as crime scene investigators combed the river bank for evidence. In the fading light, they used flash lights to continue their work. Golnik’s mother Carol Golnik was escorted to the scene by police. As the seemingly undisturbed woman stared at her son’s body from a distance, she was surrounded by police officers. Relatives were not reluctant to speak with the media and spoke freely about the life and death of little Larry. "He was a little turd." said one relative, identified only as an uncle, "He was always in trouble at school, no friends, he was a major brat." Other relatives shed more light on the useless life that Larry had lived in his 8 short years on the planet. "He was a failure in everything. He couldn't tie his shoes, was always stealing things, he was a bully, getting in fights, wetting his bed, started fires all over the place, tagging on fences, walls, and cars, he lied all the time. I mean to tell you, he was a little turd.". Other family members recounted how Larry's teachers were constantly calling from school with reports of his misbehavior. "The day before he vanished we got a call from his teacher, saying how he was a distraction to all the kids and would we please consider taking him to another school." The consensus felt by most in this small tight knit community was that it was a case of "good riddance". “This was a heinous crime in which a child has died. This time though the kid was a brat. It is the kind of crime that usually gets maximum punishment, but probably won't happen here, because... eh, who cares?” declared Police Constable Ed Mayhew. “I have heard that little Larry had already made a huge mess out of his life, so, while its sad and all, I guess, good riddance." Constable Mayhew further stated, “There is no excuse whatsoever for the murder of an innocent child, whatever the circumstances, however, in the case of Larry here, its different. He wasn't innocent. It's a shame that Larry wasn't a shining example of decency like most kids are. Then folks would all be really sad and potentially suicidal right now." According to all those interviewed larry had a loving caring family, a supportive extended family, was not poor, recieved extensive amounts of love and care, and when tested academically, he showed no signs of learning disabilities or problems requiring accomodation or medication. "He had everything. He just made a giant mess out of it." Grief counselors were not expected to be called as no one was sad about Larry Golnik's death. No funeral is expected. Larry's remains have yet to be claimed by relatives. According to Larry's mother, they never will. "Send the little [expletive] to a science lab or something." she said lighting a cigarette.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Things I find intolerable!

Being a human means having to put up with a lot of annoying things on a daily basis. Here is a list of some things that I absolutely can't tolerate. By the way, they are NOT in order!

stings
cuts
broken bones
getting out of the shower in the cold
showering in cold water
waiting for service/food in a restaurant
waiting.
rude customer service
rude drivers
being late
being early
people who think they know everything, but don't
people who aren't very smart, but think they are geniuses
arrogance
selfishness
my chin
my gut
when pretty women have NO calf muscle definition
people who don't follow through with a promise
"I forgot" as an excuse
backstabbers
having to say "I'm just kidding" when people don't understand my sardonic wit
explaining what sardonic means
people who tell you the surprise ending of a movie or show
roaches
brussel sprouts
calling parents (I'm a teacher)
a wasted opportunity
slow drivers
tailgaters
men's bare feet (especially when I'm about to dine)
waking up early for work
entering a crowded room late (the grand entrance)
obese people
rap music
getting painted into a corner
pressure sales pitch
when people who came into the restaurant after me get serviced before me
blisters
sweating in bed
people who talk in a group just to hear themselves speak
dumb questions (Yes, there ARE dumb questions. Plenty of them.)
kids who refuse to work (I'm a teacher)

Ancient Astronauts

Ok, ok... this is fascinating! Ancient astronauts. Nuff said. Well, not really... this is a mind-blowing concept that makes my tummy tingle when I really think about it. In this topic there is intrigue, adventure, inter-dimentional travel, gods, myths, history, pre-history, artifacts, anachronistic artifacts, ancient technology, evidence of ancient technology, UFO's, conspiracies, and on and on... WOW! Proponents of ancient astronaut theories claim that humans are either descendants of (or creations of) extraterrestrial beings who landed on Earth thousands of years ago. They also claim that much of human knowledge, religion, and culture came from extraterrestrial visitors in ancient times, in that ancient “astronauts” acted as a “mother culture”. Other proposals include the idea that civilization may have evolved on Earth twice, and that the visitation of ancient astronauts may actually show the return of descendants of ancient humans whose population was separated from earthbound humans. These ideas are generally not accepted by most scientists. Proponents argue that the evidence for ancient astronauts comes from supposed gaps in historical and archaeological records, and they also maintain that absent or incomplete explanations of historical or archaeological data point to the existence of ancient astronauts. The evidence is said to include archaeological artifacts that they argue are anachronistic or beyond the presumed technical capabilities of the historical cultures with which they are associated (sometimes referred to as "Out-of-place artifacts"); and artwork and legends which are interpreted as depicting extraterrestrial contact or technologies. Mainstream academics say that a gap in contemporary knowledge of the past doesn’t prove that the ancient astronaut ideas are a necessary, or even plausible, conclusion to draw. Academic researchers in related disciplines generally maintain that there is no evidence to support the proposals of ancient astronauts or “paleocontact”. Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, however strongly believed in the concept that earth was 'seeded' with life by some intelligent extraterrestrial species, for the purpose of ensuring life. He believed that this could have been done on any number of planets, possibly using unmanned shuttles. He talks at length about this theory in his book Life Itself. Further reading...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_astronauts

Also, if interested, there are a couple books you MUST read on the subject.
#1. Chariot of the Gods, by Erich von Däniken
#2. The Earth Chronicles, by Zecharia Sitchin

Also, check these websites out!
http://arcturi.com/AncientAliens.html http://www.s8int.com/
http://www.legendarytimes.com/index.php

Here is another cool website showing some "evidence"... http://www.alienswerehere.com/AncientAlienEvidence.html

Of course most, if not all of it, is pure hogwash, but it is still interesting and intellectually stimulating. Peace out!

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Shakespeare!!



I am really into, and digging Shakespeare! The only problem I have is that no one else I know right now enjoys it like I do. Everyone thinks Shakespeare's stories are "boring", or "hard to understand", or "educational", or "too wordy"... yet they will sit and watch a soap opera or reality TV show (which are nothing but talking) and won't bat an eye. 

 The fact is, Shakespeare's plays are edge-of-your-seat melodrama! The action is driven by the dialog. If I tell you about a battle I witnessed, would you say it was boring because I did not show you film footage of the battle? No! Through intensity, description, and tone of voice, my story could be exciting and even thrilling. So it is with Shakespeare... 

Does this sound boring to you? Macbeth includes intense battles, regicide, prophetic witches, bloody daggers, a creepy castle, madness, suicide, ghosts, murder-for-hire, hallucinations, treachery, a sword-fight showdown, and a brilliant surprise ending. 

Hamlet includes swordfights, gravediggers, ghosts, murders, treachery, madness, trickery, an assassination, incest (sort of), drunkeness, suicide, poisoned drinks, poisoned swords, and deaths galore. 

 Titus Andronicus has war, murder, human sacrifice, cutting off hands, cutting out a tongue, rape, infanticide, hangings, beheadings, and even cannibalism. 

 The Tempest has an enchanted island, a roaming monster, an angelic creature, a wizard, some hilarious drunken fools, romance, and fighting. 

 Richard III includes treachery, trickery, murder, abuse of power, villainy, multiple ghosts, and a huge final battle scene. Boring? Please.

There is more to entertain here than any modern movie. Each play has its share of plot twists, surprises, fiendish villains, death, gallant heroes, beautiful women, and hilarious comedy relief. 

In short... real entertainment!

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Favorite Shakespeare plays

Here are my top 5 favorite plays from Shakespeare (in order):

1. Hamlet
2. Macbeth
3. Richard III
4. Titus Andronicus
5. Richard II

other great Shakespeare plays I have seen:

The Tempest
Henry V
The Merchant of Venice
King lear
The Merry Wives of Windsor

I have also seen the following plays, and while I enjoyed many parts of them, and think they are no-doubt great, I personally wasn't all that moved by them: "Midsummer Nights Dream", "Much Ado About Nothing", and "Romeo and Juliet".

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Sick? No more!

I cast off that Allergic Rhinitis in about a week or two. My ears are still popping occasionally, but I feel great. I seem to be tossing off these illnesses in a week or so. They used to linger for a month or more. Plus, I used to have chronic sore throats. Now that I am in better shape, I am able to rid myslef of these illnesses more efficiently. Yet another reason to lose weight. Incidently as of right now I have lost around 30 lbs. Feels great!

Shakespeare ROCKS!!

Anyone who hasn't seen a good Shakespeare play is really cheating themselves out of some top flight entertainment. My favorite Shakespeare plays are as follows:

#01. Richard III
#02. Macbeth
#03. Hamlet
#04. The Tempest
#05. Julius Caesar
#06. Richard II
#07. The Merry Wives of Windsor
#08. The Merchant of Venice
#09. Othello
#10. King Lear

While there are some good parts, and characters, I never cared much for Romeo & Juliet. Same with Midsummer Night's dream. Alls Well That Ends Well is good, but I prefer my Shakespeare actiony and violent.

For a good intro to Shakespeare may I suggest the Animated tales. They are short and sweet and present Shakespeare in all his macabre majesty.